![]() Some scholarly debate has been devoted to the question of whether Tutankhamun was the son or brother of Akhenaten, and the identity of his mother. Howard Carter, who discovered the tomb of Tutankhamun, was equally, struck by the matching appearance of his mask and mummy both to Akhenaten and to his mother, Queen Tiye. Harrison, the late Professor of Anatomy at the University of Liverpool, who examined the king’s mummy in 1963, found a striking similarity with artistic impressions of Akhenaten, suggesting that they were close relations. A text on a lion of red granite in the British Museum states that “He restored the monuments of his father (again ancestor is meant) Amenhotep III.” There cannot be any doubt that he belonged to the Tuthmosside royal family of which Tuthmosis III (King David) had been the head four generations earlier. A linen shirt found in his tomb and dated to Year 7 of Akhenaten, indicates that this was the year of his birth. Tutankhamun was born in the city of Amarna. There is nobody apart from Tutankhamun of whom it can be said that these conditions-Son of the Highest, seated upon the throne of his father (the sense here is ancestor) David-were fulfilled. Luke describes the forthcoming birth of Jesus in the following terms: “He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David And he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever and of his kingdom there shall be no end” (1:32-3). We have already identified Joshua as Jesus. One is the biblical Joshua, the prophet the other is Tutankhamun, the anointed king who succeeded Akhenaten on the throne after his abdication. We have two names of successors to Moses, whom I have identified as the Pharaoh Akhenaten. Yet it seems the only logical conclusion to draw from the evidence. This, I realize, is a challenging-and will, for many people, be a disturbing-statement. The Dead Sea Scrolls support Osman’s contention that this Teacher of Righteousness was in fact Jesus.Īll the evidence points to the identification of Tutankhamun as the historical Jesus. The Essenes believed themselves to be the people of the New Covenant established between their Lord and themselves by the Teacher of Righteousness, who was murdered by a wicked priest. Yet it was also the Essenes who, following the death of Tutankhamun and his father Akhenaten (Moses), secretly kept the monotheistic religion of Egypt alive. Osman contends that the Essene Christians-who followed Jesus’ teachings in secret after his murder-only came into the open following the execution of their prophet John the Baptist by Herod, many centuries later. and was regarded as the spiritual son of God. Using the evidence available from archaeology, the Dead Sea Scrolls, the Koran, the Talmud, and biblical sources, Ahmed Osman provides a compelling case that both Jesus and Joshua were one and the same-a belief echoed by the early Church Fathers-and that this person was likewise the pharaoh Tutankhamun, who ruled Egypt between 13 B.C.E. The Gospel writers themselves were of a later generation, and many accounts recorded in the Old Testament and Talmudic commentary refer to the coming of the Messiah as an event that had already occurred.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |